๐ What's the chemistry?
The two unknown solutions
Solution Q is aqueous iron(III) nitrate โ the Feยณโบ makes it
orange-yellow. Solution R is aqueous sodium carbonate โ colourless.
Part (a) โ two negatives that matter
- Dilute nitric acid just dilutes Q: the orange colour becomes paler and โ crucially โ
there is NO effervescence, so Q contains no carbonate. (You use this in (b)(iii).)
- Silver nitrate โ no visible change โ there is no chloride in Q.
Part (b) โ mixing Q and R
Feยณโบ meets COโยฒโป: a reddish-brown precipitate forms and carbon dioxide effervesces
(limewater โ milky). The examiner insists the limewater test is actually performed โ the
(b)(ii) carbonate deduction has no evidence without it. Dilute sulfuric acid then dissolves the
precipitate to a yellow / brownish-orange solution โ solution X, which is labelled and
retained for part (c).
Part (c) โ two tests on X
- (c)(i) Zinc: effervescence and warmth (zinc + the acid in X gives hydrogen), the solution turns
colourless, and after pouring off, the zinc is coated with a greyish-black / brown deposit โ
zinc displaces iron because zinc is more reactive (that is (d)(ii)).
- (c)(ii) NaOH: a reddish-brown precipitate, insoluble in excess โ Feยณโบ. Adding
aluminium foil and warming gently reduces the nitrate: a pungent gas turns damp red litmus
blue โ ammonia โ NOโโป present. (The supervisor also noticed a hydrogen 'pop' from Al + NaOH โ
a correct bonus, but not marked.)
Examiner tips (from the real report)
- Strong candidates described Q becoming paler with the acid โ and "clear" is NOT
"colourless".
- Do not invent a white precipitate with the silver nitrate โ there is no chloride here.
- Tie the (d) deductions to your own recorded observations, not memorised facts.